Gone Girl Review

5 Oct

Gone-Girl-2014-film-poster “What have we done to each other?”

This is the question Nick Dunne poses to the world in the first minute of Gone Girl, and it hangs over every single plot development and over every ounce of characterization in the remainder of the David Fincher-Gillian Flynn film. It’s a mesmerizing ride, a two hour-plus piece of glorious filmmaking and pure entertainment that immerses you in an atmosphere that never lets go of its frenetic pace, that never ceases to be compelling.

The film is essentially broken down into three acts, with the first act being the only one I can describe sans spoilers (check out the spoiler section for more detailed thoughts on the other parts). At the beginning, we have all the components of a generic murder mystery: the good husband, the missing wife, the astute detectives, the overturned table, the broken glass. We become privy, through flashbacks, to how Nick and Amy’s relationship developed, how they met and flirted and had sex on a coffee table, and we see a loving couple get married.

However, there’s a key piece of dialogue in this part that encapsulates what their dynamic is all about: “All else is just background noise.” These are two people who understand each other, who attempt to eschew societal conventions, who attempt to be “not like those other couples”. It’s them and only them, and although that’s a feeling that many couples feel–especially during the honeymoon phase of a relationship–we get the sense that something’s off with these two. We get the sense that Amy’s disappearance may be a result of something that happened between her and her husband, and the rest of the country seems to think so as well.

So, the question becomes whether Nick killed his wife or not, and the constant hounding by the town and the media wears him down. They pick up on every small detail, every smile and interaction, and as they’re analyzing the hell out of it, no one seems to be able to look away. Throughout the film, people are transfixed by Ellen Abbott, talk show host, and her Nancy Grace-ness, by the sensationalism of the media and the apparent clearcut nature of the situation. There’s a bad one and a good one, they believe, and the bad one deserves to be crucified while the good one deserves adoration. They have expectations because society as a whole sets expectations; we have stereotypes that are perpetuated by cable news or the internet or even a film like this one, and those expectations influence the way we perceive others.

And, in the end, perception is key. Looking good on television is a key. Putting on a facade is often what results. Flynn’s script challenges us to look at the roles we’re expected to play, the way we’ve lived our lives, and it does so through a very unique relationship between Nick and Amy Dunne. It does so through a phenomenal ensemble, through a surprisingly good Tyler Perry and a creepy Neil Patrick Harris and a heartbreaking, yet entertaining, Carrie Coon and a scrambling Ben Affleck. However, the star of the show is Rosamund Pike, giving a masterful performance that wonderfully showcases her wide range and should lead to many more roles for her. She is simply captivating.

In essence, this is a mystery and a horror movie and a satire all at once. It’s disturbingly hilarious and emotionally hard-hitting and directed with a passion, and it emphasizes the fact that although we’d like to believe we’re in complete control of our lives, sometimes, the world oversimplifies us. Sometimes, putting up a facade is what’s needed to keep pushing on this society, and sometimes, self-delusion is an inherent aspect of a relationship. Throughout the film, Fincher and Flynn decide to delude their audience as well, and what we’re left with are husbands and wives and friends and family whom we believe we know at one second, but realize we don’t at the next.

“You don’t know what you got ’till it’s…” is the tagline of the film, but if you never truly had something in the first place, can it really be gone?




-So, if you’ve seen the film, you know how much of it rests upon the big twist in the middle. It’s extremely difficult to talk about the themes of the movie without giving that away, so it’s nice to be able to explore those ideas further in this section.

-One of the marks of Pike’s brilliance is that even her narration gives me chills; it’s often overdone, but she nails it in this movie, and her “Cool Girls” monologue halfway through is especially chilling. It also kickstarts the whole thing into high gear with a truly exhilarating sequence there. As for the rest of Pike’s performance, there are pretty much zero false notes; whether she’s staring at the TV screen during Nick’s interview (“It took me to the woodshed” is one of my favorite moments in the film) or whether she’s covered in Desi’s blood–and damn, what a scene–she commands the screen.

-More on Amy: we can see that she’s very much her own person and is possibly a sociopath, and there’s a lot of self-delusion that goes on here even as she’s deceiving others. Case in point: her fantasies, her idealized versions of herself, never factor in the possibility of being robbed by hillbillies.

-The idea of structuring much of the film around the news show essentially means structuring the film around blanket statements like “what is it about a child that makes men…”. And that’s what the media does, doesn’t it? Many of us desire simplicity; we want the clearcut solution with the bad guy and the good guy, and we act accordingly once an accusation has been made. The media, throughout this whole film, is looking for the easy solution to appeal to the masses, so it winds up picking apart every small detail about Nick.

-One of those small details: the smiling. It’s interesting to note that for those two instances–at the press conference and with the casserole woman–it’s someone telling him to smile that causes him to force a smile. They aren’t necessarily telling him to smile because they know it’ll hurt him, but rather because it’s an expectation they have when pictures are taken, even considering the context of “Missing, possible dead wife”. And then, of course, people realize that he probably shouldn’t be smiling, there’s another set of expectations to deal with. He just can’t escape the scrutiny, no matter what he does.

Also, when the smile comes back, it’s at the end when he’s revealing the pregnancy. He was being ripped apart for it earlier in the media, and now he’s being adored, and here at the end he’s implicitly being told by society that he needs to smile and be happy. As Officer Gilpin says earlier, “You’re wife’s home. Can’t that just be enough?” That smile is recontextualized like the first scene of the movie is.

-The film’s big point is that there are certain societal expectations that are pervasive in our culture, and it’s how you live even given them that makes your relationship what it is. Nick and Amy eventually buy into the phoniness of it all and understand each others’ phoniness, and they wind up constructing themselves according to what others think. We get the sense that Nick deludes himself at the end as well, and Amy returns to him because she wants that phony side of him, the side of him that was brought out while he was courting her. Because in the end, although not all marriages are like this one–this is seriously at a whole new level(s)–deceptions and facades are innate to every relationship to some extent.

-Nick and Amy become the fiction that is much of the diary. For example, Nick actually uses force and slams her against the wall at the end.

-It’s important to remember that not all Amy’s victims are blameless. Desi, for example, is extremely controlling, and that’s a side of him that was probably even worse during their relationship.

-How the hell can she bring herself to leave that glorious lake house?

-New tagline: “You two are the most fucked up people I’ve ever met.” –Tyler Perry

– “Sometimes, the simplest answer is the right one.” “From my experience, it’s not.” And thus, the film.

-At the beginning, you can see the various pens at the top of the screen while Amy’s writing in her diary. Nice touch there.

-I like how Boney tells Noelle that they’ll have a talk between shampoos, and Amy and Nick literally do that at the end of the film. Speaking of, hospitals don’t let you walk home covered in blood unless you’re in a movie and you really need a cool scene in the shower.

-Nick calling Amy a bitch at the end draws a connection to his father, who uses that word a lot.

-Amy’s parents do not come across as good people in this film.

-I wish Nick messed up during the interview so that he could be pelted with gummi bears from off stage.

-THAT CAT. I thought it had something to do with the murder, for all the times it shows up.



Zodiac remains Fincher’s best film.

-Margo is so awesome in this movie.

-In case you haven’t heard, Fincher and Flynn are teaming up again for HBO’s Utopia. That should be fantastic, although I’ve heard that the original series is so strong that there’s no need for an American remake.

-I feel like this is another Fight Club, what with people mis-construing the meaning of the film and using it to further their own beliefs. Yes, there are ideas of gender roles in here, but accusations of misogyny…I can see why people would have a problem, but I don’t agree. Amy is the way she is not because she’s a woman, but because she’s Amy.

-Kim Dickens is wonderful. That is all. Watching her on last week’s Sons of Anarchy helps me appreciate her in a role–her Gone Girl one–that actually utilizes her talents well.

-The opening credits are gorgeously filmed, and the way the names appear and disappear is a nice way to illustrate the “gone girl” title.

-Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are geniuses. Their pounding, intense score is a huge part of why this film works as well as it does. Listen to the soundtrack at some point; it’ll be worth your while.

-Casey Wilson is in this as Noelle Hawthorne, “idiot neighbor”. I miss Happy Endings again.

-I haven’t read the book yet, so if any book-readers would like to offer up some thoughts, that would be much appreciated.

-Thus begins awards season. I haven’t reviewed many films this year, but look for reviews of BirdmanNightcrawler, Interstellar, FoxcatcherInherent Vice, and more over the next few months. I’m excited.

Photo credit: Gone Girl, Regency Enterprises

14 Responses to “Gone Girl Review”

  1. aguywithoutboxers October 5, 2014 at 8:18 am #

    Excellent review! Thanks! Much love and naked hugs! 🙂

  2. The Vern October 5, 2014 at 10:11 am #

    Awesome review. I love that you describe this as a horror, a mystery and a satire. It is funny how we can be mainpulated by the media without having any real facts. I;m excited to read that both Fincher and Flynn will be teaming up again and yes the score by Reznor and Ross is really good.

  3. MovieManJackson October 10, 2014 at 5:14 pm #

    Wonderful review; makes me wish I talked more about this! Loved the themes of identity and media as well, gives the movie something that should keep it relevant for a while.

  4. sarah9461 October 13, 2014 at 6:51 am #

    You did not mention the books her parents wrote, “The Amazing Amy” series. I thought of the Kardashian clan, whose mother manipulates their images and and the girls actually believe the fantasy (Kim’s disasterous 72-day marriage to the basketball player, she needed a Ken to play her Barbie-bridedoll image’s groom, but that did not work out as she had planned). I have to feel that the real Amy was psychologically damaged by having her life intertwined with the fictional “Amy” her whole life.
    I thought Ben Affleck was very good, but I thought that his sister, Margo, was going to flip out and actually kill Amy at the end for coming up with a “pregnancy,” as if that would solve anything. The worst thing to do to a bad marriage is to add a baby to it.

    • polarbears16 October 13, 2014 at 11:18 am #

      Ah, yes. I sort of alluded to it when I mentioned how her parents came off, but I should’ve explored that more. Great, great point about her being psychologically damaged by all that.

      I never got the sense that Margo would be someone who’d do that, but that’s an interesting thought.

  5. Niall McArdle February 1, 2015 at 12:33 am #

    i thought it was a bit “finchery” but I liked it. My take on it is that it’s the closest Fincher can get with a studio film and a big budget to making an art-house film; it struck me as an arthouse take on a thriller. I read and enjoyed the book; from what I recall, the film is quite faithful to the book; perhaps TOO faithful. I fully agree with you about Rosamund Pike; it’s a note perfect performance. Completely mystified as to why Carrie Coon did not get a Best Supporting Actress nomination. It’s funny though; when the film was released it was all anybody wanted to talk about – it was the anti-marriage movie, the anti-date movie; there was the whole cool girl thing … it pretty much ate up the zeitgeist for a full month … four months later, it seems to have been forgotten. Regarding Affleck smiling, apparently Fincher cast him because Affleck sometimes looks uncomfortable smiing. Yes, Zodiac is still Fincher’s best film.

    Also, watch Utopia. It is brilliant (at least the first season was). A HBO remake seems pointless. Utopia works well for a number of reasons, many of which are to do with a certain Britishness. None of the actors are what you would call “beautiful” … striking-looking in some cases, but not the usual fare that you see in American shows. ‘ll be very curious to see what the HBO remake does with that. There’s a little boy in it from what would in America be termed ‘the projects’: since American shows generally refuse to believe that white people can be members of an underclass, I suspect that the character in the remake will be rewritten as a black or latino kid. Visually the series is very striking; it’s very violent in a highly stylised way – there is one shocking moment with a shooting spree in a school that will leave your jaw on the ground.

    • polarbears16 February 2, 2015 at 9:07 am #

      Yup, and I’m pretty disappointed it was forgotten. What I find really interesting is that a movie released all the way back in March–The Grand Budapest Hotel–somehow got enough support to win the Golden Globe. I was happy about it, but very surprised as well.

      And yeah, I heard that about Affleck. Great decision for that press conference scene, that’s for sure. And I will definitely check out Utopia.

      • Niall McArdle February 2, 2015 at 5:24 pm #

        yes, it doesn’t happen much that a film released in spring is still in people’s minds come awards time. I think it’s a good thing, though; maybe it will convince studios that there is a demand for decent films all year long instead of just in the last eight weeks of the year. I have a pile of films to get through that were all released in either late november or early december; they all look good, and the ones i’ve managed to get to have all been great (foxcatcher, whiplash, birdman, nightcrawler). i still have to see inherent vice and wild and cake and a most violent year and still alice and …. well, you see what i mean.

      • sarah9461 February 3, 2015 at 1:22 pm #

        I think all the attention to Budapest Hotel is just a nod to all the delightful work Wes Anderson has done over the years. I still watch Moonrise Kingdom every time it is on!

  6. Niall McArdle February 2, 2015 at 6:06 pm #

    I was just roaming your blog to see what other shows you have and have not watched, and it appears you haven’t seen Black Mirror or The Honourable Woman. Black Mirror is great; you need to watch it (it’s also being remade, maybe, for the US), but it’s def. worth seeing. Two seasons, 3 eps each, plus a Christmas special with Jon Hamm. Superb stuff; basically, a Twilight Zone for the Digital Age. Also, if you haven’t seen The Honourable Woman, then you’ve missed the best TV show of 2014 and the performance of Maggie Gyllenhaal’s career. Oh, also The Knick; definitely watch The Knick.

    • polarbears16 February 2, 2015 at 9:01 pm #

      I have seen The Knick, and I liked it (although I didn’t love it). Definitely brilliant performances all around, though, and impeccable direction by Soderbergh.

      Black Mirror and Honourable Woman I’ve been meaning to check out for a while now. Thanks for the recommendations.

  7. Flemming Erik Carlson February 13, 2015 at 2:10 am #

    I absolutely hated this movie. The ending was the worst, and I had so many problems with the script, the events, the clues, how the police handled things, how the police didn’t notice things, and the blood on her in the hospital drove me nuts! You mean to tell me they didn’t clean the blood off of her when she was in the hospital and sent her home covered in it with a scrub shirt thrown over?? Come on! And she was so calculated yet couldn’t protect herself from getting robbed by the woman and her boyfriend?? Really? The cops never checked the shed till late in the movie? The cops never mentioned the fireplace in the living room, yet it gets mentioned at the end of the movie? Again really? No cameras in the casino?? Well that is just crazy. And the cops could go to the scene of the murder and find the champagne bottle? OMG! And these are just some of my complaints. LOL! This movie was ridiculous. You had to suspend your beliefs so many times. I was screaming aloud at my TV set throughout the whole movie. It was a wonder I didn’t break it when it got to that unbelievable and unrealistic ending. I don’t know. Must have just been me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: